On March 31, I cited Robert Samuelson’s Washington Post article in the blahgue:

“Call it Uncle Sam’s hedge fund,” Robert J. Samuelson wrote in today’s Washington Post. “The rescue of the American financial system proposed by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is, in all but name, a gigantic hedge fund.” “‘Leverage’—borrowing—helped create this mess. Now it’s expected to get us out,” he said.

Along with noted economists Krugman and Galbraith, Stiglitz joined the ranks of the sane, as reported on April 3rd:

Nobel prize-winning economists Paul Krugman, a professor at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey, and Joseph Stiglitz, a professor at the Business School of Columbia University in New York, blasted Geithner’s plan for putting the taxpayer on the hook for losses with what they say is little likelihood of success.

“The Geithner plan works only if and when the taxpayer loses big time,” Stiglitz wrote in the New York Times this week. “With the government absorbing the losses, the market doesn’t care if the banks are ‘cheating’ them by selling their lousiest assets, because the government bears the cost.”  Krugman wrote in the Times last month that “Obama is squandering his credibility” with the plan.

Now, Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky warns in todays Financial Times:

“One of our strongest recommendations of the last reports was: Do not expand the TALF to buying legacy assets. If its structure is not changed considerably, it’s very, very dangerous… We could be buying securities that are backed with assets that we know were likely riddled with fraud.”

Neil Barofsky

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: