Life is a corrupting process from the time a child learns to play his mother off against his father in the politics of when to go to bed; he who fears corruption fears life.”
–Saul Alinsky

Obama's Suggested Reading For Teen InternsThis is a direct quote from Rules for Radicals, one of the books recommended on page 4 of Obama’s ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA internship program, directed at recruiting America’s high school students, to“build on the movement that elected President Obama, by empowering students across the country to help us bring about our agenda”.

Other suggested reading includes:
The New Organizers, Zack Exley
Stir It Up: Lessons from Community Organizing and Advocacy, Rinku Sen
Dreams of My Father (Chicago Chapters), Barack Hussein Obama

Instead of teaching high school children about the history of our Constitiution, the struggle of our founding fathers and their Declaration of Independence from British Imperialism; instead of teaching them about the ECONOMIC tyranny of monetarist oligarchies which have historically promoted feudalism and colonialism across the planet, we have a president pushing the ideals of far-left, radical socialists.

Here is another quote from Alinsky:

(The) first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.

Who is Zack Exley? From ZackExley.com:

He directed the online campaign for the British Labor Party’s 2005 re-election, and was Director of Online Organizing and Communications at Kerry-Edwards 2004. Zack spent the 90’s working as a union organizer. He speaks on progressive strategy as well as online organizing, advocacy and fundraising.

Who is Rinku Sen, aside from authoring The Accidental American: Immigration and Citizenship in the Age of Globalization? From inthesetimes.com, she describes herself and her politics as follows:

I’m a race woman, so that’s the first lens I use. Since race is a part of most things, I see myself as an economic progressive, a feminist and sexual liberationist … In addition to new immigration policy, we also have to finish the job of creating a fair globalization, by heading toward transnational labor, tax, social welfare and governance systems.

These are not historical figures whose life works have been chronicled and examined by successive generations as the cornerstones of the sovereign nation-state of our republic, but rather they are socialist, progressive idealogues installed into globalist-funded think tanks like the Applied Research Center or New Organizing Institute.

Whether these misguided progressives really understand the true nature of the Trojan Horse of globalism or are simply disingenuous, conflicted protagonists who embrace Alinsky’s culture of corruption, as an end which justifies their means, is more or less irrelevant.

The relevant question is: Are these the role models that YOU want for our next generation of leaders? Did you know who they are, what they profess, and did you know that Obama endorses their system of belief’s? And finally, is this the kind of transformational change you voted for, if you voted for Obama?

More and more, these so called progressives reveal themselves as either hypocrites or idiots, for as Alinsky claimed in his 1971 PLAYBOY interview:

America isn’t Russia in 1917 or China in 1946, and any violent head-on collision with the power structure will only ensure the mass suicide of the left and the probable triumph of domestic fascism.

So do followers of Alinsky advocate global fascism over domestic fascism? Do they even understand what fascism or corporatism represents? Do they somehow think that a global “power structure” of their design would trump fascism? Are they oblivious to the global economic power structure which already exists under the regime of global central banking? Is that regime behind their puppet strings — or do they actually, foolishly, believe they can overthrow it, while simultaneously empowering it?

And … do you think that Obama would have been elected if he openly campaigned on this bizarre brand of confused and conflicted change? 

These are rhetorical questions obviously–check the links provided and Google the authors to see for yourself.

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: