As Americans are fed bits and pieces of information which network executives think will engage them long enough to sit through the commercial pitch for Goldline or Cialis, what tends to amaze me most is the largely myopic view of what supposedly holds our attention. America this and American that, and American politics and the American people are all very important to Americans. But the media must broaden its scope to the larger global arena in order that veiwers complete the puzzle and comprehend the big picture.

To do that, we must turn to other sources. And as we do that, we gradually begin to cast away notions that “the democrats” or “the republicans” or “the teabaggers” are America’s greatest threat, and we begin to see what’s been happening in Europe, for example, with the gradual elimination of sovereignty, and suddenly our enemies become much larger and more foreboding than before.

On Jan. 17, London Daily Telegraph columnist Ambrose Evans Pritchard commented on a European Central Bank draft document which rewrites the European Union treaty, reporting that they are proposing “a new ‘legal order’ that transcends a ‘largely obsolete concept of sovereignty’ and imposes a ‘permanent limitation’ on the states’ rights.” Pritchard added that EU nations will be instructed to destroy their economies, and “if they fail to marshal public support for draconian austerity, they risk being cast into Icelandic oblivion.” Shortly after it appeared, the Daily Telegraph suppressed the article, pulling it from its web site altogether.

Followers of world events, especially those reported upon in prior posts, should not be surprised that the European Central Bank is usurping the role of governance over Europe. Just witness how our Federal Reserve has basically undertaken the same role in America (even if by stealth, and behind closed books for now). Why is it that when the ECB speaks of sovereignty as a “largely obsolete concept” alarm bells don’t sound off across America? These are the exact words of Zbigniew Brzezinski, David Rockefellar and the usual suspects of Bilderberg, Trilateralist and CFR globalists, whose ideologies should be the topic of daily conversation among American patriots who defend the principles of national sovereignty inherent in our Constitution.

But unfortunately, American mainstream media doesn’t report upon the global power grab or the Bilderberg agenda. There is little mention of international events (outside the scope of the Haitian earthquake disaster) and I would not be surprised, quite frankly, if more than 90% of Americans have ever heard of the Lisbon Treaty, or the Maastricht Treaty, or even the the European Union, much less  the North American Union and what these all epresent for the possible future of America. So without any cognitive awareness of the globalist agenda, proceeding unhindered in Europe, it is extremely difficult to connect the dots from here to there, so as to formulate the larger picture.

On a side note, to those who suffer from a peculiar “British Empire” fixation, and who associate all globalist movements as emanating from the City of London, I would point out that such bias fails to take into consideration the American confederates in this global conspiracy who are equally guilty of furthering the corporatist agenda: consolidation of power, an end to sovereignty, the primacy of monetarism, global resource control, neofeudalism and austerity.

I sincerely doubt that Lloyd Blankfein or Jamie Dimon would give a rat’s ass to defend the American Constitution, or our country’s sovereignty, any more than they give a damn about their customer’s (who they routinely screw) or the American public at large (who by the way they also routinely screw with the help of the FED and their captured pawns in the Treasury and SEC).

Globalism is indeed a major sponsor of mainstream American media, but what they really sponsor is the suppression of information. For if you really knew what they’re selling, you’d sure as Hell not buy it (though you might go out and buy a shotgun instead). The media outlets owned and controlled by globalist or trilateralist multi-national corporations and the old money dynasties who run them do not want Americans to understand their agenda, and frankly, the middle management executives who run network programming doubt very much that it’s good for the advertisers who pay their meager $300,000/year salaries anyway, since those advertisers are owned or influenced by the same global coup.

I therefore beat the anti-globalism drum pretty hard here, because I don’t see Americans being awakened to the advancing drumbeat of globalism elsewhere, as it spreads across a defeated Europe and advances to the weakened United States. China, Russia and India may thumb their nose at them today, but their time will also come.

Terrorism? That mostly Saudi-funded, globalist-sponsored diversion? Small potatoes compared to Globalism. For Terrorism can never fully advance it’s ideology into America, whereas globalism already has. Not fully perhaps, but ubiquitously enough to help create the mess we’re in today.

I hope readers of this blog will assimilate the information presented among the many posts which address the cancer of globalism, such that when the fodder of mainstream media comes flying at you, you can “read between the lines” to disect the important implications in what is presented, and how it is spun, and how it either serves the enemy or not. For the enemy is well hidden among us, and in very high places, and at the risk of being labeled a globalism McCarthyist, I can truly say that while the threat of Communism may have been overestimated in the 1950′s, America is severely UNDERestimating the threat of Fascism inherent in the ascension of globalism.

And it is no wonder, considering the lack of transparancy which is often reported upon; and yet for most American’s what lurks behind that veil of secrecy remains largely unknown.

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: