There are visible signs today that the global warming debate rages on. Not since the publication of Darwin’s Origin of the Species has such a disagreement between opposing scientific camps raged.

Just as there are those who believe that MONEY, and the power of those who wield it, is impotent against the forces of truth and justice that are the hallmarks of our venerable institutions, foundations, think tanks and universities, there are those who contend that MONEY can never corrupt science, and that scientists have an inherant “empirical oath” if you will that transcends the influence of funding.

And yet, the East Anglia fraud findings are now joined by further IPCC ”shaky science” regarding the Himalayan Glacier debacle, and we must ask ourselves: If not MONEY, what then causes scientists to abandon their empirical oath and commit fraud?

In 1859, while available empirical evidence supported Darwin’s theories, he was met with fierce opposition from creation theorists, backed by thousands of years of religious indoctrination which refute the archeological findings. Even to this day, Creation theorists still oppose the skeletal remains of Neanderthal, Peking and Cro-magnon man as presenting irrefutable evidence of an evolutionary progression from these early hominids to homo erectus (modern man).

Today, we witness a similar scientific debate. And while man-made global warming advocates appear to be less reactionary than creation theorists, overwhelming evidence suggests that man has little to do with global climactic change (nor could he have any significant effect upon it for many years to come) .

However, unlike what Darwin faced in 1859, what has come to light in this climate debate, is willful manipulation and suppression of data, and continuing evidence of fraud, as well as the admission of fraud, among man-made global warming advocates.

What should be a concern here, as we look at the larger picture, is the influence of MONEY upon science, as an anecdote to the way in which money influences socio-political policy. For it has long been accepted that money corrupts politics, even among those who might take exception to the idea that it can be used to “influence” science as well.

For those who cry “conspiracy theorist” when the argument is made that the MONEY wielded by generational banking dynasties funds a globalist ideology which creeps into foundations, think tanks, universities and governments, as in the Tri-lateral commission, the Council on Foreign relations, and indeed Harvard–in fact, any “venerable” institution which name is preceeded by “Rockefellar” or “Vanderbilt” for example, should take note of the way in which MONEY has no doubt been responsible for the so called “science” that backs the very same globalist power grab which certain socio-political ideologies at play in American politics today seek to serve.

It is no wonder that money, being the root of power, is said to corrupt–and that absolute power corrupts absolutely. The trojan horse of globalism clearly invades the practice of empirical science, through the power of its financial backing.

It is well known that the world’s most wealthy families can trace their lineage to a centuries long coordinated effort to use their money and power  to achieve world domination in one form or another (especially through global central banking and the “capture” of governments). 

In the case of central banking, the scheme is to control the world’s currencies and interest rates, which has worked out exceedingly well to shift the wealth of the world’s middle classes to the global cabal of wealth horders. In global warming, the hoax is contrived as a scheme to control the world’s carbon emmissions. For those who control carbon emmissions would have the entire world’s productive capacity under their control. As such, they hoard the world’s resources as well.

Is it so hard to believe then that fraudulent science is funded by those hoarders of wealth and resources — the global power seekers of a corporatist new world order?

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: