So it’s the World Bank (not the IMF or BIS) which is to be the Global FED which controls the world’s economies under the EU and UN, through the guise of a global climate change agenda. We quoted climate sceptic, Lord Christopher Monckton, only a few posts back. Do not let his “royal sounding” title mislead you. He is an honest man, and a friend to the working class, with much to risk in his quest to expose great powers. We should embrace both his wisdom and his courage.

Here are the facts:

Monckton, who is in Copenhagen attending the UN climate summit, said that when he attempted to obtain a copy of the current draft of the negotiating text agreement, he was initially rebuffed before he threatened an international diplomatic incident. “I insisted, and it took about 10 minutes and they consulted each other with three or four of them arguing over it — none of them would produce the document…. I said I know this treaty exists because this is what the conference is all about,” said Monckton.

Only after Monckton threatened repercussions was he handed the current draft of the treaty, and the details it contained are perhaps a clue as to why the UN officials were so keen to keep it under wraps. “Once again they are desperately trying to conceal from everybody here the magnitude of what they’re attempting to do — they really are attempting to set up a world government,” said Monckton, adding that the word “government” was no longer used, but the process of further centralization of power into global hands was clearly spelled out in the treaty.

Monckton said that the new world powers outlined in the treaty would be handed authority to, “tax the American economy to the extent of 2 percent GDP, to impose a further tax of 2 percent on every financial transaction … and to close down effectively the economies of the west, transfer more jobs to third world countries — all of that is in the treaty draft.”

As a leaked six-page document out of Copenhagen and reported on by the London Guardian revealed on Dec. 8, this massive new system of global taxation will be paid not to the UN, but directly into the coffers of the World Bank; and would make any money to help “poor countries adapt to climate change,” dependent upon them taking a range of conditional actions.

Monckton illustrated the size of the new taxes being proposed, by noting they amounted to at least half of the entire U.S. defense budget. “This is how they are going to fund this vast new government they’re setting up,” said Monckton, adding that he counted around 700 new bureaucracies that would be created as a result of the treaty. Monckton outlined how the new taxes would be enforced, stating, “They’re going to auction allowances to emit greenhouse gases, and if you don’t buy an allowance to emit greenhouse gases, you won’t be allowed to emit them,” adding that the text contained a provision for a “uniform global levy of $2 dollars per ton of CO2 for all fossil fuel emissions,” as well as an additional tax on every commercial plane journey, except ones that go in or out of poorer countries.

We have discussed in previous posts that the outsourcing of productive labor has been the hallmark of America’s industrial decline, and had always been advantageous to the globalist agenda. Outsourcing of productive economies places the control of economic production in the hands of the economic “movers”, the money changers who arrange the transfer of economic production to consumption based economies - this is one source of profit, but it also places economic dependency in the hands of the international money movers.

Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.  – Thomas Jefferson

Let the global monetarist system collapse, like it nearly did in 2008, and all things dependent upon money to function (nearly everything in the modern world, but most certainly international ”trade”) will simply cease to function and all dependant economies collapse. To avoid that collapse: global bailouts. The global agenda keeps consumption economies dependent upon consumption and production economies dependent upon production, whereas sovereign nations who are self-sustaining are independant (does anyone recall the Declaration of Independance?)  and therefore not as much at risk. The global agenda is to foster global economic interdependency under the thumb of monetarist rule.

The climate control agenda, or “emissions control agenda” is merely an extension of this global power grab. It’s easy to see if you’ve been following the background. Sadly, most people have not.

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: