It was one of those “inconvenient truths” that dispelled Al Gore’s global warming theory, and whether or not Gore had good intentions initially bears no relevance on the fact that recent scientific data points to a pattern of smaller, cyclic warming and cooling trends, and that we are now at the tail end of a cyclic warming trend that is beginning to cool down, according to all empirical evidence available to rational, thinking beings.

But the fact remains: earlier claims of unabated “global warming” presented a convenient opportunity for frightened, backward-thinking Malthusian fools to hoard resources (and the money that buys them) against the inexorable triumph of nature over man, a helpless beast unable to control the elements of nature, from the threat of climatic Armageddon to the ironic self-destruction of his own over-breeding.

In addition, global warming presented a convenient opportunity for exploiters to devise yet another commodity speculation scheme, based on carbon derivatives trading, namely the Cap and Trade travesty to leverage, tax and speculate upon ”emissions” stemming from the carbon output of multi-national corporations down to the very breath escaping from your lungs.

These opportunities, in a world dominated by behavioral propaganda and moral abandon, perpetuate the myth. For to dispell it with the inconvenient emergence of fact, is to forfeit the many profligate opportunities that have grown up around the myth, and to vanquish the Heart of Darkness which haunts the pitiful, fearful, global elite.

As I have stated in this blog before, the hoarding mentality of the aging patriarchs whose generational banking dynasties dominate the world under their construct of a global monetary system, is easily explained as a by-product of their own material obsessions. You do not need a degree in psychology to recognize that an obsession with the accumulation of wealth goes hand in hand with hoarding behavior, stemming from a deep rooted fear of the withdrawal of resources which provide comfort and privilege. Such are the fears of the power obsessed, whose obsession with “overpopulation” – a condition not presently under their control – could interfere with their dominion over such resources.

Rather than to attempt to clarify the global warming confusion perpetuated by the forces and reactions above (and considering that such clarification is easily accessed by the growing consensus of “untainted” academic and scientific thought) it seems more productive to point out the lengths to which certain academia IS in fact tainted by the promise of reward or favor to be gained in the propagation of the myth, so as to further establish the reach of such behaviorist and exploitist propaganda, as it corrupts other elements of our society, both scientific and policital.

My thanks to the “hackers” (a more appropriate term would be “patriots”) who exposed one element of said reach, as outlined below:

November 23, 2009 (LPAC)—Hackers have broken into the computer system of Britain’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and have posted on the Internet thousands of e-mails and other documents. The CRU has not verified the authenticity of the published documents, but has admitted that their network was breached.

The posted messages show manipulation and collusion in exaggerating global warming data, destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, and private admissions of flaws in the public claims of the global warming advocates.

The Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University has been engaged in propagating the World Wildlife Fund’s fraud of global warming since Prince Philip and associates began the fraud in the 1970s in the service of global population reduction. The World Wildlife Fund finances the CRU, as do the Royal family’s oil giants Shell and BP. The CRU played a central role in the “authoritative” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report.

One leaked e-mail, dated July 1999, says the World Wildlife Federation in Australia wants a particular section of a report on climate change “beefed up” because it is worried that section looks “conservative” when compared with the Australian government’s science agency’s data. Here is an excerpt from one of the leaked e-mails:

On Sun, 16 May 1999, [Dr.] Shrikant wrote:
Friends,
I’m enjoying the current debate about CO2 levels. I feel that we are using the GCM scenarios, and we MUST use exactly those CO2 levels for crop model runs, so all data is consistent. So if we are wrong, we are uniformly wrong and adjust our explanations accordingly whenever we agree on things. Now to use different data will be hard to explain.

“Dave S.” replied:
Subject: RE: CO2
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 09:21:35 -0600 (MDT)
I want to make one thing really clear. We ARE NOT supposed to be working with the assumption that these scenarios are realistic. They are scenarios-internally consistent (or so we thought) what-if storylines. You are in fact out of line to assume that these are in some sense realistic–this is in direct contradiction to the guidance on scenarios provided by the synthesis team….

The Associated Press reports, “In one leaked e-mail, the research center’s director, Phil Jones, writes to colleagues about graphs showing climate statistics over the last millennium…. Jones writes that, in compiling new data, he had ‘just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline [in global temperature],’ according to a leaked e-mail, which the author confirmed was genuine.”

Here is one e-mail excerpt on the need for censorship: “Pielke is also losing all credibility by replying to the mad Finn as well — frequently as I see it. I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. K and I will keep them out somehow, even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!”

All such vain efforts, exposed by the unforgiving light of reality.

What the globalist-captured governments and think tanks and acedemia of the world need to understand is that globalism, and it’s signature climate hoax, are dead. It has failed, and despite relentless, coordinated efforts to revive it, made by the government’s of the so-called developed nations, the masses have recognized the swindles, and they have abandoned them.

The American people, for example, are abandoning the conspicuous consumption culture which they have been conditioned to embrace. No amount of Madison Avenue propaganda will send this nation’s middle class back into it’s former mindless, debt-robot existence. Celente’s trend forecasts are true in this regard. The populist revolt against all things global has begun, and a very modest Christmas holiday this year will disappoint cheap-labor global producers of electronic gizmo’s, while the rise of small business shops and retailers will be greeted with patriotic support from holiday shoppers.

Our Federal government may continue to prop up the zombie of globalism, spraying away the stench with stimulous air freshener and pumping up the corpse with taxation formaldehyde, but dead it is, and dead it will remain. THE STATES will rise up to reclaim the mantle of Constitutional government and fiscal responsibility, and they will empower the people to reclaim their heritage and their Constitution.

What we have to be thankful for this week, is our unique American Heritage, and our American Constitution, for though the globalists may trample upon them, they cannot extinguish them. The American people reply, “DON”T TREAD ON ME” –a warning to be heeded by the pitiful “hoarders elite”, whose mountains of paper promises, shifted into their coffers from the world’s middle classes through their desparate global liquidity swindle, will never defend against the wrath of an empowered, righteous people.

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: