I have several times made clear in this blog the purpose and intent of ObamaCare, and recent events reinforce the conclusions of such intent. Clearly, as Eric Sprott and others have been shown to understand, both Social Security and Medicare are to be decommissioned, and it is just a matter of the severity of the next global economic panic attack before the American people realize that the insolvency of the US government is the ultimate entitlement-killer.
The world’s waning confidence in America’s full faith and credit is a self-fulfilling prophecy that looms nearer as each day’s incompetance in areas of policy reform, implementation and effectiveness take their toll. The IMF has also warned Obama that unfunded entitlements in America must go, and in their June report, they reinforced their understanding of his obedience:
“We welcome the Administration’s intention to work toward developing a political consensus on Social Security reform once health-care reforms are complete.”
But ”the world” as Dick Morris so ominously puts it, is not waiting around any longer for the music to stop in Obama’s political game of “ring around the rosey” before pulling the chair out from under America’s unmatched quality of Health Care, beginning with the rationing of Breast Cancer screening. Saving the lives of a certain percentage of American women between the age of 40 and 50 is too high a price to pay, when we have banks all over the world insolvent and in dire need of a continued bailout line from what’s left of America’s declining strong, healthy, wage earning taxpayers.
So moving forward with the newly recommended USPSTF Breast Exam limits is one such way to prepare the stage for the coming IMAC rationing, and if Obama can’t get his assignment completed as instructed, we’ll just have to move forward outside of the 1st 2000 page verdict on America’s entitlement reforms.
Here is the response from the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the president of the Society of Breast Imaging, who agree that the decision will lead to “countless deaths.” They continue:
The USPSTF recommendations are a step backward and represent a significant harm to women’s health. To tell women they should not get regular mammograms starting at 40 when this approach has overwhelmingly been shown to save lives is shocking. At least 40% of the patient years of life saved by mammographic screening are of women aged 40-49. These recommendations are inconsistent with current science and apparently have been developed in an attempt to reduce costs. Unfortunately, many women may pay for this unsound approach with their lives.
The ACR is joined by the American Cancer Society and leading doctors such as Dr. Daniel B. Kopans, head of radiology at Harvard Medical School, who said “Tens of thousands of lives are being saved by mammography screening, and these idiots want to do away with it. It’s crazy—unethical, really.”
Congressmen and women have also spoken up, pointing to the decision as a step toward rationing. They include Rep. David Camp of Michigan, and Marsha Blackburn (TN), Cathy Rodgers (WA), and Sue Myrick (NC), who held a press conference today to say “This is how rationing begins. This is the little toe in the edge of the water…. This is what we have warned about.” Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI) is quoted saying the decision is a “huge step backward” that put the nation on a “slippery slope” to discouraging screening for other diseases based on cost rather than medical need.
I agree that this is an initial “foot in” to swing wide open the door to fascist health care rationing, but what is most egregious to me, is that despite our undeniable need to cut unfunded entitlement costs, an issue which long precedes the bailout swindle of 2008, and a need which can be met in an ethical and humane reform of Health Care Insurance abuses and administrative overhead costs, Obama simply leaves the Congress and Special Interests to wrangle incessantly over legislation which protects the HealthCare Denial for Profit Industry, even if it means no real structural reform, and therefore no savings, at all.
Thus the student Obama shows he can be merciless, since not effective, when it comes to barely passing his first midterm exam. Danger Barack … Danger!
You Should Also Check Out This Post:
- Keeping Score - GO ENDEAVOR !!!
- Reality: The Final Frontier
- Tradition
- What a Summation
- The Facebook Homeowner Revolution
More Active Posts:
- What's the Big Deal about State Banks - doesn't every State already have one? (4)
- Ready to fund the next big bubble? Carbon Derivatives (3)
- Healthcare (2)
- States be Damned! You get what you DESERVE! (2)
- The Dichotomy of Toxic Debt "Value" (2)
- Other States Take Note: State Bank of Florida Proposed (2)
- Stern's Crony-Corporatism (2)
- Shorter's Last Stand (2)
- Mutually Assured Consequences (2)
- The American Way - an Economic Culture (1)

My comment is not for this particular post. It’s the way I view not only this post but your entire site. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!! Our tax dollars has already made these white collar criminals too wealthy already!
But why should they think any different? We’ve bailed out these people several times over the past century. They knew the taxpayers money would come to the rescue when they entered their ‘den of theives’.