When the smiling Obamanites shake their heads in disbelief of the “Republican radical right” and their distorted “death squad” hyperbole, it is tempting to ponder the question and ask oneself if maybe things are a bit blown out of proportion. Maybe the intent of health care reform is not so diabolical after all. Maybe we are exaggerating the euthanasia element.

After all, it seems to be Emmanuel’s larger age curve of “scarce intervention eligibles”, pitted against pockets of declining oldsters who show up at these town hall meetings, half-crazed from early senile dementia or LSD flashbacks from the sixties, who are hell bent to cause a ruckus and disrupt the health care agenda of the “Great Neutral Hope”.

Scace Intervention Probability Curve

Yes, in today’s world, it is tempting to view the debate this way, but thank God that the greatness of this country, and the elderly who remember it, have shed the light of Freedom and Truth to awaken Britain, in its folly to accept the compromise of rationed resources to all but the precious banks.

U.K. TELEGRAPH EXPOSES THE BRITISH BLAIR-LED GOVERNMENT’S FASCIST ENTITLEMENT REFORM FOR WHAT IT IS:

Sentenced to DEATH on the NHS

This article certainly has no sinister motive to derail US Health Care Reform. It’s authors cannot profit from that derailment, they simply report upon the Mathusian death tax already implemented in Britain, and being prepared for implementation in America by the puppet masters at the IMF and BIS.

In Britain, the shifting of the “entitlement of wealth” to the banking class precludes a shifting of the entitlement of medical intervention to the wealthy, and this reform has already been made. It is the United States, with its eternal idealists, that simply refuse to accept the reality of their own sovereign (and moral) default. Sacrfices must be made. Resources to all but the banking class are scarce, and when interventions are scarce, the Emmanuelian curve must prevail.

The Death by Malthus Tax is simply this: If you can afford intervention, it is your right to prolong your life against all odds. But if you cannot afford intervention, and the odds are aginst you, we need your bed for someone worth our investement to save. 

The true wealth of a society lies in its ability to care for its people, and that ability can be monetized and claimed by the ruling elite, to be paid for by taxing the poor with a reduced ability to care, or “scarce resources” scenario. This is how health care is taxed by the ruling class.  This is what you get when you have a leader torn between the far-left socialist view of 100% care for all, tempered by the globalist conditions of rationed resources for the wealthy elite.

On the same day the Daily Telegraph published the article above citing that one of every 6 people who died in the United Kingdom from 2007-2008 had been subjected to “involuntary euthanasia” they also published a letter to the editor by palliative care experts denouncing the NICE-adopted “Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP)” which was originally developed as a way to care for cancer patients towards the end of their life, but has been adapted to apply to all patients in more than 300 hospitals, 130 hospices, and 540 care homes in England.

The signers of the letter denounce the program as giving premature death sentences to patients by denying them fluids, nutrition, medicine, and treatment after making a determination that they are close to death, a determination that is sometimes incorrect. This program was recommended as a model by the British NICE system in 2004, during the regime of Tony Blair. Blair’s healthcare advisor from 2000-2004 was Simon Stevens who is now with United Health Care in the U.S., which has the exclusive Medicare Ovations franchise to provide insurance for AARP members. THIS is why thousands of seniors are dropping AARP–not because they’re stupid, but rather because they are not so easily fooled as Obama’s blind-faithfuls.

The doctors’ letter charges that patients are wrongly put on the pathway, which creates a self-fulfilling prophecy that they would die. In 2007-2008, 16.5 percent of the deaths in Britain came about after continuous deep sedation, according to researchers at the Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, twice as many as in Belgium and the Netherlands.

But the “Great Neutral Hope” and by his 34 Imperial Czars (if you can keep track of them as they are added and resign) can certainly avoid the pitfalls of Britain’s Health Care “reform”. Look at how successful they’ve been so far with wealth distribution reform.

You Should Also Check Out This Post:

More Active Posts: