Some might wonder why a blog devoted to the bank bailout insanity would focus so much on the health care debate. The point is simply this: We wouldn’t need to rethink our moral obligation to society if we hadn’t taken the bait to bail out the money-changers.
As we get past the moral dilemma of paying their ransom, and become gradually desensitized to shifting 95% of the world’s monetary wealth to 5% of it’s people by means of a planned systemic sabotage, a shift in social values takes place, and we find ourselves in the midst of a rationing debate.
If you take the time to read this 9 page paper, co-written by Obama health care policy advisor Ezekiel Emmanuel, you will probably sense that cold and calculating shift, and I suspect that it will both surprise and anger you. In fact, my response to it may be summed up as “enraged disbelief”.
It is SHAMEFUL that the American people should be subject to this euphamistic Fascist doublespeak. Scarcity is not the mother of allocation–it is the bastard child of economic predation. Promoting social usefulness by “attenuating” lower priority lives? ”Tough choices” is the new code phrase for the unthinkable. The tough choice appears already made – we sacrifice our humanity to the economic Imperialists. This is an averice tax on humanity.
You should ask your state policy makers when the armbands are going to be handed out and where the gold fillings will be sent. Prepare to be shocked. This is NOT science fiction:
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/PIIS0140673609601379.pdf
But … far be it from me to criticize such academic ponderings without offering a viable alternative. As long as we here in America (despite our own clear moral crisis) are willing to make life and death ethical / moral decisions regarding lives worth living or not, I propose we consider a more judicious approach.
I propose that we use a MALY or Malfeasance Adjusted Life Years formula. Under the MALY system, individuals acting to subjugate society to serfdom while they pillage the serfs and their children offer so little benefit to society at large that they simply do not deserve to live. After all, these are the people responsible for our “scarcity of intervention resources”, therefore they deserve a consideration of ZERO adjusted life years.
To those people I offer what they propose for me. Just let them THEM die. Society will be better off for it.
You Should Also Check Out This Post:
- Keeping Score - GO ENDEAVOR !!!
- Reality: The Final Frontier
- Tradition
- What a Summation
- The Facebook Homeowner Revolution
More Active Posts:
- What's the Big Deal about State Banks - doesn't every State already have one? (4)
- Ready to fund the next big bubble? Carbon Derivatives (3)
- Healthcare (2)
- States be Damned! You get what you DESERVE! (2)
- The Dichotomy of Toxic Debt "Value" (2)
- Other States Take Note: State Bank of Florida Proposed (2)
- Stern's Crony-Corporatism (2)
- Shorter's Last Stand (2)
- Mutually Assured Consequences (2)
- The American Way - an Economic Culture (1)
My comment is not for this particular post. It’s the way I view not only this post but your entire site. KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK!!! Our tax dollars has already made these white collar criminals too wealthy already!
But why should they think any different? We’ve bailed out these people several times over the past century. They knew the taxpayers money would come to the rescue when they entered their ‘den of theives’.